“Reifying the meaning of symbols... means a terrible waste
of our distinctively human capacity to think creatively.”
(Z80)

But relationships and resemblances can still be seen creatively...

Which layer has the flexibility, the possibility of rich interconnections? The quote presumes that the flexibility resides in the symbolic layer - that if it isn’t there, it isn’t anywhere. But maybe that ain’t so. With a diagram, could flexibility at a higher (even if not symbolic) level be shown as allowing more options? Such as, perhaps, seeing over the wall?

Hold on a minute. Aren’t we autistic folks supposed to be particularly skilled at manipulating things? One commonly-cited example is the solving/assembly of jigsaw puzzles, in some cases with the pieces turned face-down. So suppose that reifying a symbol gives us a “handle” on it, a way to pick it up and manipulate it. I would suggest that perhaps my interest in and use of visual metaphors to illustrate points is done in a reifying manner; I literally see the principle or point being acted out in the metaphor, and would modestly suggest that some degree of creative thought is involved.

Last revised: June 23, 2007
(c)2007 Dave Spicer
(back to project main page)